Markings 15 - Gene Editing

August 13, 2017

The debate over editing the human genome is bound to continue for a long time, now that the new CRISPR technology promises to make it quick and easy.

 

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation recently spoke to Margaret Somerville, of McGill University in Montréal, (recently appointed Professor of Bioethics at University of Notre Dame Australia). on this topic, which touches upon profound issues of human identity. Somerville opposes altering the human genome.

 

'The analogy I’d make is to our physical environment. We have new technologies that we’ve used in our physical environment, and very recently, we’ve come to the awareness that it’s not indestructible and that we can do damage that is irreversible. And we’ve now recognized, as the conference in Paris this week is talking about, that we have to hold our physical ecosystem on trust for future generations, not to lay it waste, not to leave future generations worse off than we are – and hopefully better off.

 

And I think we can say the same about what I call our metaphysical ecosystem, the values, beliefs, attitudes, principles, stories that we tell each other and buy into to form a society, that we also have to hold on trust. I believe this idea, this area of actually designing future humans, and that’s what this about, contradicts what we need to maintain as the base of our metaphysical ecosystem – that is, respect for human life, in general, and respect for every individual human, and that includes human embryos.'

 

©Jeff Guess 2017

 

 

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Featured Posts

What are the 'Essentials' of a Good Poem? - Markings 150

May 15, 2019

1/6
Please reload

Recent Posts

April 28, 2020

April 27, 2020

April 24, 2020

April 18, 2020

April 14, 2020

April 1, 2020

March 31, 2020

March 21, 2020

March 20, 2020

March 15, 2020

Please reload

Archive